The anti-porn commitment means he promises to “uphold the rule of law by aggressively enforc[ing] existing federal laws to prevent the sexual exploitation of children online, including the federal obscenity laws, child pornography laws, sexual predation laws and the sex trafficking laws.” He also pledges to: “Aggressively enforce the Children’s Internet Protection Act (CIPA) requiring schools and public libraries using government e Rate monies to filter child pornography and pornography by requiring effective oversight by the Federal Communications Commission; “Protect and defend the innocence of America’s children by advancing public policies that prevent the sexual exploitation of children in a manner that is consistent with the government’s compelling interest in protecting its most vulnerable citizens, within the limits set forth by the First Amendment.” Hillary Clinton has not signed the anti-porn pledge, citing a policy of not signing pledges, according to the Washington Examiner.
The racy snaps capture 25-year-old Melania Trump — then Melania Knauss — in various stages of mostly undress, and in at least one, in a nude embrace with another woman.
But until then, here's a little something from twitter. Rick Since the political wave has not abated and I already made my contribution to it, here is another contribution with political undertones, political prisoner theme, that is.
That girl is definitely in merciless peril after being hunted and cornered. ----------------------------------------- booley wrote: To all you anti Trumpsters who keep posting on here: Don't you realize it's the Feminazis in the Democrat Party who would like to shut this site down on the grounds that it constitutes "hate speech"? Right, that's why there were a whopping 361 people charged with obscenity by the Obscenity Prosecution Task Force during Bush's reign of terror. If he becomes President you have to remember how he reacts and replies to anyone, especially women, that says anything he disagrees with or is critical of what he said or did in his crooked business dealing. And the fact that the film can be watched guilt-free for no cost just adds to the bargain (well, guilt-free regarding the payment aspect, at any rate). After being forced to swim ashore she is hunted then, once cornered, she gets belly stabbed, knife ducked, her tongue ripped out then finally disemboweled. @Marc: I think I am a good candidate to answer your question #14714 The girl in the middle appears in MOOD PICTURES -------------- Sentenced to C. (corporal punishment) Stepmother Rehabilitation Institute ELITEPAIN -------- Domina Education 2 Dr Lomp's Practice 1 Hey guys and gals! today marks the first of several entries of the excruciating tale called 'Bunny's Boob Job! Set your faces to 'stunned' when you see what happens when Bunny gets abducted by ALIENS!
What subsequently happens to her, with a knife, is almost sickening :) So sickening you're smiling, I see. He openly calls women he doesn't like "pigs" for daring to ask him a question he doesn't want to answer. (Sorry, I had to use that reference) No sign up fees, ALL free to enjoy!
I'm frustrated as a GIMP fan, of course, but also as a story-teller.
Regardless of whether I might enjoy seeing a garment torn from the body of an attractive actress, or a woman might feel a stirring at the fantasy of a handsome actor feeling such an overpowering passion that he feels compelled to take her by force, the presence of a willing audience is not enough for professional scolds. How does one pen a letter to HBO, suggesting that for the sake of their creative teams, they tell the harbingers of weasel-words like "problematic" that they should go fuck themselves? A balanced discussion panel on NPR is a mild-leftist, a Bernie-grade socialist and a crazied radical SJW. The campaign to mold the fabric of the movies into what the regressive left finds acceptable is nothing new. I don't care if would hypothetically do better under Jimmy Carter or Gerald Ford. The future belongs to grass root movements, is recent history is to be observed.
The photos were published in a now-defunct French magazine in the 1990s.
Trump spokesman Jason Miller told CNN that the mogul is “a little more focused on the direction of the country and what we need to do to get it turned around.” “They’re a celebration of the human body as art, and [there’s] nothing to be embarrassed about with the photos. So, looks like we are heading back to the dark ages again if Trump gets in.
Trump would actually enjoy the Bring Out the GIMP website, LOL." Not necessarily true, because in Trump's case he wants hurt women but not in an erotic fantasy way like we do.
This site is not the same as 95% of porn websites that the Republicans are targeting, because we fantasize violence against women so we can't say for certain a Democrat president wouldn't want to get rid of us too.
I have no idea how JD found such a sharp print, since all the ones I've seen are muddy and poor quality. They had a "critic" going off on the portrayal of sexual violence in HBO programming, particularly- but not limited to- "Game of Thrones".
Here's the direct link to the scene: [www99.zippyshare.com] Here's a picture I really like - even though there's no nudity. As far as I can see Trump is only going after kiddie porn and limiting access to minors. Porns is probably best hidden away under the counter just like in the old days. IMO - anyone who votes for Hillary must be totally deluded - the woman is 100% evil. (You can find the snippet of "Here and Now" for the price of a web search if you feel the need to fume.) And... I don't spend a lot of time raging about the derned mainstream media, but when so much twaddle goes unchecked and unquestioned, it becomes a real stretch to call such analyses anything like "news".
My only criticism is that the background should look more like a dodgy room in the police cellars rather than the antiseptic white that's been used. It's a pity it is just straight bondage, but you can extrapolate to a realistic interrogation scene in any time setting or maybe a captured by "savages" soon to be ravaged scene. Must we be vigilant, in our greater wisdom, to keep our eighteen-to-eighty year old children from consuming something that might warp their tiny little minds?