If you look at the fossil record, you find a succession of organisms that suggest a history of incremental development from one species to another.You see very simple organisms at first and then new, more complex organisms appearing over time.The problem is that much of the theory of evolution is unbelievable. creationism is the cause of the unsolicited turmoil in your life.
In fact, some finds, such as fossil remains of marsupials in Antarctica are strongly supportive of evolution, given that Antarctica, South America, and Australia were once part of the same continent.If evolution did happen, then you would expect not just that the fossil record would show a succession of organisms as described above, but that the succession seen in the record would be compatible with that derived by looking at currently living creatures.There is no way to look at the fossil record and interpret the evidence as pointing towards anything other than evolution — despite all the gaps in the record and in our understanding, evolution and common descent are the only conclusions that are supported by the full spectrum of evidence.This is very important when considering inferential evidence because inferential evidence can always, in theory, be challenged on its interpretation: why interpret the evidence as inferring one thing rather than another?After two hundred years of Darwinism, in creation vs.
evolution many unbelievable beliefs about evolution have evolved.
If you believe that life is an accident, this has caused considerable conflict and turmoil in your life that was not of your conscious actions.
If evolution is your belief, it is an integral part of your thoughts and your demeanour.
As such it represents another independent piece of evidence for common descent and a very significant one since the fossil record is a window to the past.
We should also be able to make some predictions and retrodictions as to what we would expect to see in the fossil record.
If common descent occurred, then the organisms found in the fossil record should generally conform to the phylogenetic tree — the nodes on the tree at which a split occurs represent common ancestors of the organisms on the new branches of the tree.